Elements of Fraud
Questionable Workers' Compensation claims can be a costly and frustrating experience for employers. Over our years managing CA Workers' Compensation claims, we've seen many instances where everybody knew that an employee was lying in order to obtain benefits. Unfortunately, trying to obtain a fraud conviction comes down to what you can prove, not what you know.
Keep the following eight elements in mind the next time you are working with your insurance carrier to build a Workers' Compensation Fraud case against a dishonest employee. They must be proven to ensure justice!
- False representation
- A false statement of fact (a lie) must be made directly by the injured worker. It can also be a false statement claiming no knowledge of a fact or issue.
- Materiality
- A "material misrepresentation" is one that would likely affect the actions of a reasonable employer or insurance adjuster in regard to a Workers' Compensation claim. Basically, does the lie really matter to the claim and the claimant's ability to receive benefits? An example of an immaterial (not material) lie is if the injured worker claims to not do illegal drugs but a post-injury drug test comes back positive. A positive drug test, by itself, is not a valid reason to deny a claim in California. As such, this lie is not material even if the claimant thought that it was.
- The employee's knowledge of falsity
- At the time the lie is told, the employee must have known that the representation was in fact false.
- Intent that representation be acted upon
- The intent of false representation must be to mislead the employer or insurance company.
- Employer's or insurance company's ignorance of falsity
- The person or people to whom the lie is told (the adjuster and/or employer) must not have known that the statement was false at the time. If the employer or adjuster knows (for a fact) the whole time that the claimant is lying, the court throws out the fraud charge because in this situation the employer and/or adjuster is seen as baiting the injured worker into fraud.
- Reliance
- The employer or insurance company must rely on the false statement made by the employee. An example of a reliance issue is if you could prove that the injured worker knowingly lied about his average weekly wage to the adjuster for the purpose of increasing his weekly benefit, yet his weekly Workers' Compensation disability payment (TTD rate) was based on a wage statment provided to the insurance company from the employer. Even though he lied with the purpose of increasing his benefits, this would not be a fraudulent situation because his payments were not based on his lie, but instead on the wage statement.
- Employer's or insurance company's right to rely
- The employer or insurance company must have a right to rely on the employee's lie. An example here is if an adjuster starts paying disability benefits because the claimant said that he couldn't work but the appropriate treating doctor has said that he can work. This lie would not be fraudulent because California law mandates that disability is determined by a doctor. The adjuster had no legal right to base the disability decision on the claimant's false statement.
- Damages
- There must be a loss due to the false representation. For a Workers' Compensation case this would mean that the employee received some benefit, disability or medical, as a result of the lie.
Do not despair if you are unable to prove each element as soon as you think an employee may have lied to receive Workers' Compensation benefits. Remember, we are not lawyers and sometimes real life doesn't fit so neatly into nice little categories. Speak with your insurance company and/or attorney as soon as possible if you believe Workers' Compensation fraud has taken place at your company.
This information is meant to be used as a guide so you know where your insurance carrier is coming from when presented with a questionable claim. You will also be able to make an informed decision if your insurance company is planning on pursuing a costly fraud investigation into an issue that is very unlikely to result in a conviction. Ask the tough questions and don't let your premiums go up in the future due to costly and sometimes unneccessary special investigations!
WCassist.com
Types of Workers' Compensation Fraud
Some people only think of a staged or fictitious injury on the part of an employee when the subject of workers compenstion fraud comes up. The following is a more complete picture of what work comp fraud can be.
- Claimant (employee) Fraud:
- This is the most common and most costly form of workers' compensation fraud. Make sure that you are aware of the following types of claimant fraud.
-
- 1. Malingering:
- This is when a truly injured worker recovers from their injuries, but continues to receive benefits by exaggerating the lasting impact of the injuries.
- 2. Non-work related injury:
- When an employee claims to have been injured at work but it actually occurred away from work. Be wary of Monday morning injuries
- 3. Multiple claims:
- When multiple claims are filed for the same injury. This happens but it is very tough to prove because re-aggravations are so common for work place injuries.
- 4. Non-injury claim
- When an employee fakes an injury to receive benefits. Be on the lookout if there is a plant closing announcement or rumor.
- 5. Working elsewhere while receiving disability benefits
- This one is pretty self-explanatory. Always make sure you know if someone is moonlighting, this can be a great opportunity for surveillance.
- Provider Fraud:
- This type of fraud usually occurs when a medical provider either over-charges for a service or charges for a fictitious service. This type of fraud is more common that you might think and doctor's facilities can use very sophisticated tactics to over-charge. Provider fraud can include the following tactics, and more.
-
- 1. False billing:
- When a medical provider charges for services that never took place.
- 2. Up-coding:
- This is when a provider bills for treatment that is more expensive than the one actually performed.
- 3. Unbundling:
- This occurs when a provider performs a single service yet bills it as a series of several services.
- 4. Kickbacks:
- When a medical provider pays or receives compensation for referrals.
- 5. Self-referrals:
- When a medical provider inappropriately refers patients to clinic or laboratory in which they have a financial interest.
- Employer Fraud:
- Employers can also commit Workers Compensation fraud. This involves lying on the policy in order to pay lower premiums. This type of fraud is closely monitored by insurance companies as seen by their annual policy audits.
- Though the insurance company checks the policy regularly to confirm that the information given by employers is correct, they aren't checking to make sure that errors made by the insurance company are corrected. These errors can really add up and employers have a right to get past overpayments back!
Make sure to see how WCassist.com can help you to recover your lost profits due to policy errors made by the insurance companies. Click here now!
WCAssist.com